Ok, so I printed off my first assignments for school over the weekend and started reading...
"A part of the difficulty in debating the geoploitics lies in the absence of consensus over definition. Many scholars bring a hostile attitude to the subject, so that even fairly innocous seeming definitions of geopolitics provide a thin disguise for assumptions that are not conducive to open-minded scholarship."
And as if that didn't make enough sense...
"If only the principal sources of international conflict truly were attributable in noteworthy part to obsolete thinking, including geopolitics. In that happy event we could set about constructing a global security community in the wake of the more advanced processes of globalization."
...happy event indeed.
I'm going to have to read this fabulousness twice.
No comments:
Post a Comment