Sunday, June 29, 2008

New Yorker funnies


FROGS

“Hey, can I ask you something? Why do human children dissect us?”

“It’s part of their education. They cut open our bodies in school and write reports about their findings.”

“Huh. Well, I guess it could be worse, right? I mean, at least we’re not dying in vain.”

“How do you figure?”

“Well, our deaths are furthering the spread of knowledge. It’s a huge sacrifice we’re making, but at least some good comes out of it.”

“Let me show you something.”

“What’s this?”

“It’s a frog-dissection report.”

“Who wrote it?”

“A fourteen-year-old human from New York City. Some kid named Simon.”

(Flipping through it.) “This is it? This is the whole thing?”

“Uh-huh.”

“Geez. It doesn’t look like he put a lot of time into this.”

“Look at the diagram on the last page.”

“Oh, my God . . . it’s so crude. It’s almost as if he wasn’t even looking down at the paper while he was drawing it. Like he was watching TV or something.”

“Read the conclusion.”

“ ‘In conclusion, frogs are a scientific wonder of biology.’ What does that even mean?”

“It doesn’t mean anything.”

“Why are the margins so big?”

“He was trying to make it look as if he had written five pages, even though he had only written four.”

“He couldn’t come up with one more page of observations about our dead bodies?”

“I guess not.”

“This paragraph looks like it was copied straight out of an encyclopedia. I’d be shocked if he retained any of this information.”

“Did you see that he spelled ‘science’ wrong in the heading?”

“Whoa . . . I missed that. That’s incredible.”

“He didn’t even bother to run it through spell-check.”

“Who did he dissect?”

“Harold.”

“Betsy’s husband? Jesus. So this is why Harold was killed. To produce this . . . ‘report.’ ”

(Nods.) “This is why his life was taken from him.”

(Long pause.)

“Well, at least it has a cover sheet.”

“Yeah. The plastic’s a nice touch.”

Saturday, June 28, 2008

I almost remember

My family moved to Buffalo, NY when I was 10.

My father was a professor teaching at the University of Puget Sound in Washington State. He was offered a job teaching in Buffalo and so we moved. It was really all quite inconsequential to me. I was 10 and as long as my family was together it didn’t matter. When you are small the whole world is contained to a very few people and a very few sets of walls.

My mother thought it would be good to drive from Washington to Buffalo. She thought that it would be a nice opportunity for the family to see the country. Somehow driving across the country with three children in a wood-paneled station wagon is one of those ideas that really is better on paper. But my mother bought a map of the United States and plotted her course and we were off. She gave the children the opportunity to voice their opinion about sights we wanted to see, but I was the oldest at 10, my younger sister was 7 and my baby sister was only 2. I had no idea what was in between Washington and New York. So, I just sat with my mother at the kitchen table and nodded as she asked me if I thought going through Utah was a good idea. Seemed like a good idea at the time. It was my mother’s idea, and that inherently made it good.

Packing was a horrible thing. My father wanted everything done in a system. He was one of those people who would write his name on everything and make sure the door was locked three times. He also was the type to read the section in the paper with all the really tiny writing on it and, from behind the paper in his reading chair make gruff noises when he got to the part of the tiny writing that told him if he was making money…or losing it. (Those grunts were louder and generally more intense.) Every so often he would call me and show me a tiny little number. “Nikki, do you know what this is?” As with my mother and the map, I generally just nodded. “This is a stock and the paper tells me if it is doing well or if I should switch stocks.” I appreciate my father trying to teach me about stocks and finances in general. But his explanation about what a stock was, wasn’t exactly the kind of explanation that a 10 year old needs. After the initial explanation about stocks, I was always afraid to ask again. So, as with my mother and her rout across America, when my father showed me the tiny writing, I just nodded.

His system to packing was simple. All like things in the same box. Socks should go with other socks, pants together, toys with one another. Simple theory I suppose. Because I was the oldest I was in charge of explaining this theory to my sister. She, naturally, was skeptical of anything that came out of my mouth and always thought I was trying to get her into trouble. I have no idea what that would be. I’m certain that it had nothing to do with the time that I had her smell and then drink a whole spoon full of vanilla. Honestly, I wanted to know what it tasted like too – I just didn’t want to taste it.

So I explained this great system to my sister and she followed along with it for a while. I think her socks made it all into the same box. After she successfully packed her socks, I figured that she had the hang of it and didn’t need supervision. I went outside.

My mother went into check on my sister after a few hours and her packing had gone from the ‘like things in the same box’ theory to the ‘protect all of the stuffed animals’ theory. Kristen had gently placed two of her stuffed animals together in a box (two so they would not get lonely and probably because we were learning about Noah and the Arc in Sunday School), and then lovingly mashed around them a protective layering of whatever she could find; clothes, pants, sheets, and pillows. (Her favorite animals got the pillows.)

It wasn’t that this theory didn’t work. Technically, everything made it into a box. Additionally, she had written on the side of each box the names of the two animals contained within. She had about run out of both boxes and animals by the time my mother discovered her. And in that situation what do you do? Kristen was only 7, and it is hard to tell a 7 year old that the original plan for the animals was a big plastic bag. My mother decided to just tape the boxes before my father discovered that there were animals in with the pants.

It is better in some cases to let sleeping animals lie...in boxes...with pants.

Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Stuff and Things

In December I'm going to turn 30. Two years ago, in preparation for the impending doom, I made a list of things I wanted to do before I officially got old and started not trusting myself.

With 6 months to go, I'm coming along nicely with my 30x30 list. I still have 5 more slots, if you have any suggestions...

1. Golf Lessons
2. Learn French (working on it - je ne sais pas)
3. Foreign Stamp in Passport (Italy - with mi Mama)
4. Donate Hair to Kids w/Cancer (Done - and grown back)
5. Ride Carousal on the Mall (this was the 1st one I checked off!)
6. Enter Writing Contest (didn't win, but checked the box)
7. Belly Dancing Lessons (forthcoming Sahara Dance)
8. Whistle ‘Cabbie Style’(done and done)
9. Finish Learning Moonlight Sonata (very soon)
10. Attempt to Surf (done - and, proud to report I can surf!!)
11. Go Back to School (Done)
12. See Pyramids (done - very cool)
13. Go to the Top of the Washington Monument
14. Learn to Knit (everyone got a scarf last Christmas)
15. Jump out of a Plane (oh yes)
16. Learn the Military Alphabet (Whiskey, Tango, Foxtrot)
17. Ride a Horse (done - and in the mountains no less)
18. Buy a House (done)
19. Visit Walter Reed (done, and must do again )
20. Ride DOWN a Ski Lift (At Powder Mt. of course - totally cool)
21. Feed Homeless (Grate Patrol)
22. Have Lunch at the Pentagon
23. Learn how to Jump off Stuff on a Shortboard.
24. Teach Spinning Lessons
25. Float in the Dead Sea (done, including a mud bath)
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.

If anyone would like to join me for #7, let me know!!
Sahara Dance
Expand your dance repertoire with Latin-belly fusion! Learn fun dance combinations that fuse salsa, bachata, and other Latin styles with the ancient art of raqs sharqi. Open to all levels! Choreography is structured to be accessible to beginner students, offering modifications to challenge advanced dancers.

Politics

Working in politics is just like any other job...

Exactly like every other job save it be one tiny fact: nameless, faceless voters control your fate. The name on the door does not belong to you. But that name is on the bottom of your paycheck. If the name on the door disapears, so does the paycheck - among other important and meaningful things.

These are the days that you think to yourself, 'why didn't I just become a CPA?'

Sorry CBC.

Tunes

So, I added tunes... 1,2,3, go...
Not sure what I think of them...
I may be the slient type...
Thoughts?

Friday, June 20, 2008

GET OUT



NY Times
June 22, 2008
He’s Pregnant. You’re Speechless.
By GUY TREBAY






WHEN Thomas Beatie gives birth in the next few weeks to a baby girl, the blessed event will mark both a personal milestone and a strange and wondrous crossroads in the evolution of American pop culture.

Mr. Beatie — as anyone who has turned on a television, linked to a blog or picked up a tabloid in the last few months is aware — is a married 34-year-old man, born a woman, who managed to impregnate himself last year using frozen sperm and who went public this spring as the nation’s first “pregnant father.”

That this story attracted attention around the world was hardly surprising. Who, after all, could resist the image of a shirtless Madonna, with a ripe belly on a body lacking breasts and with a square jaw unmistakably fringed by a beard? For a time, clips of Mr. Beatie’s appearance on “Oprah,” where he was filmed undergoing ultrasound, as well as shirtless images of him from an autobiographical feature in the Advocate magazine, were everywhere, and they were impossible to look away from.

Partly a carnival sideshow and partly a glimpse at shifting sexual tectonics, his image and story powered past traditional definitions of gender and exposed a realm that seemed more than passing strange to some observers — and altogether natural to those who inhabit it.

“This is just a neat human-interest story about a particular couple using the reproductive capabilities they have,” said Mara Kiesling, director of the National Center for Transgender Equality in Washington. “There’s really nothing remarkable” about the Beatie pregnancy, she said.

Yet as the first pregnant transman to go public, Mr. Beatie has exposed a mass audience to alterations in the outlines of gender that may be outpacing our comprehension. In the discussions that followed his announcement, what became poignantly clear is that there is no good language yet to discuss his situation, words like an all-purpose pronoun to describe an idea as complex as a pregnant man.

“When there’s a lot of fascination around a figure like Thomas Beatie,” said Judith Halberstam, a professor of English and gender studies at the University of Southern California, “it points to other changes already happening elsewhere in the culture.”

Among the changes Ms. Halberstam noted are medical innovations that have expanded the possibilities for body modification. There are also studies that indicate, as Ms. Halberstam noted, that women respond sexually to the individual, before differentiating by sex. And the broadening legal scope of marriage has also had its effects on people like Mr. Beatie, who says of himself, “I am transgender, legally male, and legally married to Nancy,” but who might have trouble holding on to some of those assertions if he did something as simple as moving from Oregon.

Americans, Ms. Halberstam said, have long been fascinated by narratives of sexual transformation, at least since the era of Christine Jorgensen, an early male-to-female transsexual (born George Jorgensen Jr. in the Bronx) whose sex change, performed by doctors in Sweden, prompted The Daily News to run a front page story under the headline “Ex-GI Becomes Blonde Beauty” and made Miss Jorgensen as tabloid-notorious then as Mr. Beatie is, the man who “went abroad and came back a broad.”

The Jorgensen case in 1951 was treated as groundbreaking, just as Mr. Beatie’s was on “Oprah,” despite the well-established fact that physicians at the German Institute of Sexual Science had performed successful sexual reassignment surgeries decades before. If Miss Jorgensen’s story prefigured Mr. Beatie’s, it also pointed toward a future in which gender continues to change in response to changing laws and mores and, as important, new technology.

“The Beatie case seems like a way of having some of the Trans 101 discussions publicly, giving them one kind of a face and doing it in a way that’s not asking anybody for anything,” said Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, a professor at the City University of New York graduate school of English who has written extensively on gender. “He’s pregnant, he seems happy. It’s not in happening in any kind of a judicial, let alone criminal, context so it’s not a matter of claiming a right. It’s a matter of exercising one.”

By bringing his story to the public and disclosing the particulars of his anatomical journey, Ms. Sedgwick added, Mr. Beatie is “making visible the fact that a lot of people’s experience of making these decisions isn’t about getting a penis or losing a penis.” For many transgender people, she said, “genital surgery is not what defines gender, and that will be news for lots and lots of Americans,” who may have trouble comprehending the idea that for some, anatomy does not define woman or man.

Mr. Beatie does not have a penis; his clitoris was surgically reconfigured to mimic a phallus. And the person born in Hawaii in 1974 as Tracy Lagondino also altered his body with chest reconstruction surgery, took bimonthly testosterone injections for years to suppress feminine sex characteristics, grew a beard and saw his hairline change. Like many transmen, he chose not to remove his female reproductive organs. And so, when it was clear that his wife could not have another child (she has two grown daughters from a previous relationship), Mr. Beatie stopped hormone therapy until he could conceive.

“Not a lot of transmen get what’s called ‘bottom’ or ‘lower’ surgery,” Ms. Halberstam explained, referring to procedures like the one Mr. Beatie had, and to yet more radical interventions like hysterectomy. “If they want a penis, they don’t want a micro-penis,” she said. If what they want is to be men, she added, they see no reason why that goal is compromised by keeping their ovaries.

Issues like these have made Mr. Beatie’s story so compelling; the sense that trans identity in the Webster sense of the prefix signifies some threshold state of being — “across” or “beyond” or “through.”

Ms. Sedgwick said that if you look at postings on Web sites like Oprah Winfrey’s and The Huffington Post, “It seems as though there are lots and lots of comments saying: ‘That’s not a man having a baby. That’s a woman having a baby.’ ”

Partly that reaction results from what Ms. Sedgwick calls a phobic response to changes in identities that for most people seem God-given and settled at birth. Partly it is a matter “of people having to go through the stages of figuring things out,” she said.

As Ms. Kiesling, of the National Center for Transgender Equality, noted: “The long-term benefit of this story is not ‘Pregnant Man Trims Hedge,’ ” referring to a widely circulated photo of a bearded and pregnant Mr. Beatie wielding a power tool. “The Beatie story raises questions we’re all looking at now, in a lot of contexts,” about the welter of new possibilities produced by a landscape in which legalized same-sex partnerships reshape traditional ideas about husband and wife and mom and dad.

Contacted at home in Bend, Ore., Mr. Beatie declined to comment for this article. He was resting, he said, and would reserve further comment until after the baby is born. A book that he was contracted to write has been shelved, according to his publishers, St. Martin’s Press. And so once the “pregnant father” delivers, he can return to being the person his neighbors refer to as “a quiet, regular guy.”

By then his story may have served its purpose, Ms. Sedgwick said. It will have showed us that: “People experience gender very differently and some have really individual and imaginative uses to make of it. That’s an important thing for people to wrap their minds around.”

Tuesday, June 17, 2008

I heart zones

Ok, I'm going to get on my soap box for a minute.

Taxi meters STINK. Seriously, whose idea was this?! It's awful. I swear, every time I get in a cab now, it's this whole conspiracy theory between me and the cabbie. Why is he taking 7th street rather than Massachusetts? Why is he going around the tidal basin, where did all this traffic come from? It’s horrible and I hate it. I miss the days when I could just get in the cab and not care if I got the scenic route or not.

Additionally, meters create very bad juju with cabbies. All the sudden I’m all sorts of bossy and tell the cabbie not to take Pennsylvania Avenue (because my gracious, do their need to be 7 cabbies waiting for people coming out of the Capitol Grille?!). And just for the record, I try to be nice to cabbies as they have to sit in a car all day which I’m certain is another level of Dante’s purgatory.

I have taken maybe a dozen cabs since the change (relatively few compared to many I know) and never once, not once, was my ride cheaper than under the zone system. So the whole, ‘it’s cheaper’ argument is a bunch of hooey. It costs $4 dollars just to get in the cab. So even if you are only going 5 blocks, there is $4 to get in the cab, with the meter running there’s oh, we’ll say $3, plus a dollar for gas gives you $8, plus a dollar tip is $9. It used to be a $6.50 base, dollar for rush hour, and a dollar for tip is $8.50.

If you are going more than 5 blocks forget it. A cab from downtown to the Hill, because your cabbie is taking 7th through Chinatown to “I” street, to Mass, up Constitution all the way up to 2nd street, in front of the Supreme Court and down Independence to get to the Longworth House Office building, is going to set you back, oh… 12 bucks.

Anyway, I hate the meters. I miss the zones and I’m interested to know if the District is keeping tabs on how well the meters are working. ALthough it doesn't much mater. We are stuck with them now. I’m confident the cabbies are making out like bandits – they’ll never go back to the flat rate.

Be careful what you wish for peeps. The grass is always greener on the other side - but just as hard to mow.

Monday, June 16, 2008

Sunday, June 15, 2008

My favorite meal. (BRUNCH)

I don't generally do Restaurant reviews. I like food, and I enjoy eating out, but it's just not my niche. I'm pretty predictable actually; I would not make a very good food critic. I go to Begla Cafe for brunch, Montmartre for dinner and Sesto Senso for everything in between. (Pizza bianca to DIE for.)

But, I had the most amazing brunch on Saturday and I have been inspired to tell the world (or the greater DC/Baltimore area).

I went up to Baltimore to meet a friend. She picked the place and oh was it tasty - and worth the drive.

Miss Shirley's Cafe was started by a fabulous southern woman. Her little restaurant outgrew their humble beginnings, moved across the street and there was still a line out the door. Apparently there is a second location opening in downtown Baltimore!

I had the Challah French Toast and a side of Breakfast Turkey Sausage. I also ordered a scone because it sounded so good. The menu is just amazing. I wanted to hang out in Baltimore for a few hours so I could go back and have lunch. It was so fabulous - and I am very finicky about my french toast.

We sat right by the kitchen and the food coming off the line all looked amazing.

I am going back there as soon as possible. Anyone care to join??

Father's Day

On Friday, one of the guards I have to pass to get into work asked me if I had a father living - to wish me a happy father's day - I said 'no'. Just an easier answer than the actual answer I guess. And that's the name of that tune.

But to all the most wonderful dad's out there, happy father's day.

And, to speak some truth to a power I cannot address, here's a bit from Senator Obama.

Obama's Speech on Fatherhood
Barack Obama

Apostolic Church of God
Chicago, IL

Good morning. It’s good to be home on this Father’s Day with my girls, and it’s an honor to spend some time with all of you today in the house of our Lord.

At the end of the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus closes by saying, “Whoever hears these words of mine, and does them, shall be likened to a wise man who built his house upon a rock: and the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house, and it fell not, for it was founded upon a rock.” [Matthew 7: 24-25]

Here at Apostolic, you are blessed to worship in a house that has been founded on the rock of Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior. But it is also built on another rock, another foundation – and that rock is Bishop Arthur Brazier. In forty-eight years, he has built this congregation from just a few hundred to more than 20,000 strong – a congregation that, because of his leadership, has braved the fierce winds and heavy rains of violence and poverty; joblessness and hopelessness. Because of his work and his ministry, there are more graduates and fewer gang members in the neighborhoods surrounding this church. There are more homes and fewer homeless. There is more community and less chaos because Bishop Brazier continued the march for justice that he began by Dr. King’s side all those years ago. He is the reason this house has stood tall for half a century. And on this Father’s Day, it must make him proud to know that the man now charged with keeping its foundation strong is his son and your new pastor, Reverend Byron Brazier.

Of all the rocks upon which we build our lives, we are reminded today that family is the most important. And we are called to recognize and honor how critical every father is to that foundation. They are teachers and coaches. They are mentors and role models. They are examples of success and the men who constantly push us toward it.

But if we are honest with ourselves, we’ll admit that what too many fathers also are is missing – missing from too many lives and too many homes. They have abandoned their responsibilities, acting like boys instead of men. And the foundations of our families are weaker because of it.

You and I know how true this is in the African-American community. We know that more than half of all black children live in single-parent households, a number that has doubled – doubled – since we were children. We know the statistics – that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and twenty times more likely to end up in prison. They are more likely to have behavioral problems, or run away from home, or become teenage parents themselves. And the foundations of our community are weaker because of it.

How many times in the last year has this city lost a child at the hands of another child? How many times have our hearts stopped in the middle of the night with the sound of a gunshot or a siren? How many teenagers have we seen hanging around on street corners when they should be sitting in a classroom? How many are sitting in prison when they should be working, or at least looking for a job? How many in this generation are we willing to lose to poverty or violence or addiction? How many?

Yes, we need more cops on the street. Yes, we need fewer guns in the hands of people who shouldn’t have them. Yes, we need more money for our schools, and more outstanding teachers in the classroom, and more afterschool programs for our children. Yes, we need more jobs and more job training and more opportunity in our communities.

But we also need families to raise our children. We need fathers to realize that responsibility does not end at conception. We need them to realize that what makes you a man is not the ability to have a child – it’s the courage to raise one.

We need to help all the mothers out there who are raising these kids by themselves; the mothers who drop them off at school, go to work, pick up them up in the afternoon, work another shift, get dinner, make lunches, pay the bills, fix the house, and all the other things it takes both parents to do. So many of these women are doing a heroic job, but they need support. They need another parent. Their children need another parent. That’s what keeps their foundation strong. It’s what keeps the foundation of our country strong.

I know what it means to have an absent father, although my circumstances weren’t as tough as they are for many young people today. Even though my father left us when I was two years old, and I only knew him from the letters he wrote and the stories that my family told, I was luckier than most. I grew up in Hawaii, and had two wonderful grandparents from Kansas who poured everything they had into helping my mother raise my sister and me – who worked with her to teach us about love and respect and the obligations we have to one another. I screwed up more often than I should’ve, but I got plenty of second chances. And even though we didn’t have a lot of money, scholarships gave me the opportunity to go to some of the best schools in the country. A lot of kids don’t get these chances today. There is no margin for error in their lives. So my own story is different in that way.

Still, I know the toll that being a single parent took on my mother – how she struggled at times to the pay bills; to give us the things that other kids had; to play all the roles that both parents are supposed to play. And I know the toll it took on me. So I resolved many years ago that it was my obligation to break the cycle – that if I could be anything in life, I would be a good father to my girls; that if I could give them anything, I would give them that rock – that foundation – on which to build their lives. And that would be the greatest gift I could offer.

I say this knowing that I have been an imperfect father – knowing that I have made mistakes and will continue to make more; wishing that I could be home for my girls and my wife more than I am right now. I say this knowing all of these things because even as we are imperfect, even as we face difficult circumstances, there are still certain lessons we must strive to live and learn as fathers – whether we are black or white; rich or poor; from the South Side or the wealthiest suburb.

The first is setting an example of excellence for our children – because if we want to set high expectations for them, we’ve got to set high expectations for ourselves. It’s great if you have a job; it’s even better if you have a college degree. It’s a wonderful thing if you are married and living in a home with your children, but don’t just sit in the house and watch “SportsCenter” all weekend long. That’s why so many children are growing up in front of the television. As fathers and parents, we’ve got to spend more time with them, and help them with their homework, and replace the video game or the remote control with a book once in awhile. That’s how we build that foundation.

We know that education is everything to our children’s future. We know that they will no longer just compete for good jobs with children from Indiana, but children from India and China and all over the world. We know the work and the studying and the level of education that requires.

You know, sometimes I’ll go to an eighth-grade graduation and there’s all that pomp and circumstance and gowns and flowers. And I think to myself, it’s just eighth grade. To really compete, they need to graduate high school, and then they need to graduate college, and they probably need a graduate degree too. An eighth-grade education doesn’t cut it today. Let’s give them a handshake and tell them to get their butts back in the library!

It’s up to us – as fathers and parents – to instill this ethic of excellence in our children. It’s up to us to say to our daughters, don’t ever let images on TV tell you what you are worth, because I expect you to dream without limit and reach for those goals. It’s up to us to tell our sons, those songs on the radio may glorify violence, but in my house we live glory to achievement, self respect, and hard work. It’s up to us to set these high expectations. And that means meeting those expectations ourselves. That means setting examples of excellence in our own lives.

The second thing we need to do as fathers is pass along the value of empathy to our children. Not sympathy, but empathy – the ability to stand in somebody else’s shoes; to look at the world through their eyes. Sometimes it’s so easy to get caught up in “us,” that we forget about our obligations to one another. There’s a culture in our society that says remembering these obligations is somehow soft – that we can’t show weakness, and so therefore we can’t show kindness.

But our young boys and girls see that. They see when you are ignoring or mistreating your wife. They see when you are inconsiderate at home; or when you are distant; or when you are thinking only of yourself. And so it’s no surprise when we see that behavior in our schools or on our streets. That’s why we pass on the values of empathy and kindness to our children by living them. We need to show our kids that you’re not strong by putting other people down – you’re strong by lifting them up. That’s our responsibility as fathers.

And by the way – it’s a responsibility that also extends to Washington. Because if fathers are doing their part; if they’re taking our responsibilities seriously to be there for their children, and set high expectations for them, and instill in them a sense of excellence and empathy, then our government should meet them halfway.

We should be making it easier for fathers who make responsible choices and harder for those who avoid them. We should get rid of the financial penalties we impose on married couples right now, and start making sure that every dime of child support goes directly to helping children instead of some bureaucrat. We should reward fathers who pay that child support with job training and job opportunities and a larger Earned Income Tax Credit that can help them pay the bills. We should expand programs where registered nurses visit expectant and new mothers and help them learn how to care for themselves before the baby is born and what to do after – programs that have helped increase father involvement, women’s employment, and children’s readiness for school. We should help these new families care for their children by expanding maternity and paternity leave, and we should guarantee every worker more paid sick leave so they can stay home to take care of their child without losing their income.

We should take all of these steps to build a strong foundation for our children. But we should also know that even if we do; even if we meet our obligations as fathers and parents; even if Washington does its part too, we will still face difficult challenges in our lives. There will still be days of struggle and heartache. The rains will still come and the winds will still blow.

And that is why the final lesson we must learn as fathers is also the greatest gift we can pass on to our children – and that is the gift of hope.

I’m not talking about an idle hope that’s little more than blind optimism or willful ignorance of the problems we face. I’m talking about hope as that spirit inside us that insists, despite all evidence to the contrary, that something better is waiting for us if we’re willing to work for it and fight for it. If we are willing to believe.

I was answering questions at a town hall meeting in Wisconsin the other day and a young man raised his hand, and I figured he’d ask about college tuition or energy or maybe the war in Iraq. But instead he looked at me very seriously and he asked, “What does life mean to you?”

Now, I have to admit that I wasn’t quite prepared for that one. I think I stammered for a little bit, but then I stopped and gave it some thought, and I said this:

When I was a young man, I thought life was all about me – how do I make my way in the world, and how do I become successful and how do I get the things that I want.

But now, my life revolves around my two little girls. And what I think about is what kind of world I’m leaving them. Are they living in a county where there’s a huge gap between a few who are wealthy and a whole bunch of people who are struggling every day? Are they living in a county that is still divided by race? A country where, because they’re girls, they don’t have as much opportunity as boys do? Are they living in a country where we are hated around the world because we don’t cooperate effectively with other nations? Are they living a world that is in grave danger because of what we’ve done to its climate?

And what I’ve realized is that life doesn’t count for much unless you’re willing to do your small part to leave our children – all of our children – a better world. Even if it’s difficult. Even if the work seems great. Even if we don’t get very far in our lifetime.

That is our ultimate responsibility as fathers and parents. We try. We hope. We do what we can to build our house upon the sturdiest rock. And when the winds come, and the rains fall, and they beat upon that house, we keep faith that our Father will be there to guide us, and watch over us, and protect us, and lead His children through the darkest of storms into light of a better day. That is my prayer for all of us on this Father’s Day, and that is my hope for this country in the years ahead. May God Bless you and your children. Thank you.

Friday, June 13, 2008

I, Too, Sing America

I, too, sing America.

I am the darker brother.
They send me to eat in the kitchen
When company comes,
But I laugh,
And eat well,
And grow strong.

Tomorrow,
I'll be at the table
When company comes.
Nobody'll dare
Say to me,
"Eat in the kitchen,"
Then.

Besides,
They'll see how beautiful I am
And be ashamed--

I, too, am America.

~ Langston Hughes

Sunday, June 08, 2008

Movie Review - Amelie

Ok, so I know this movie came out years ago. I'm a little behind. Got to love the French though. I watched it in French with subtitles. Maybe next time I'll turn off the subtitles...oui?

Saturday, June 07, 2008

The Politics of HOPE

I came of age during ‘the Clintons’. The first vote for President I cast was for Bill Clinton. I worked in the Clinton White House. Those 8 years were good years.

I am/was/am/was a HRC supporter. I volunteered my time and I gave her my money. She is a strong, smart and powerful person. She would have made a very good president. She knows how to get things done, and I believe she would have done some very good things for this town and the nation. But one of the most powerful things she has done as a woman is to loose.

She should never have won because she was a woman, like no one should vote for Obama because he is black. He is a better candidate, has more support, more money, etc. That is the reason he is where he is. And that is the real equality in the race.

Don’t get me wrong, I do have my reservations about Obama. Mainly, I think he makes things too simple. Governing is not simple, and compromise is a necessity – which means most people, most of the time, think you have in some way ‘sold out’. He’s taken a pass on some votes in the Senate for this very reason. I can respect why he did it, but the longer you govern, the longer your record and if you are in this town long enough, you will indeed vote for something and then vote against it – it is a procedural reality.

But if Obama’s biggest problem is that he is pandering to the hope within all people that things can get better, it’s a whole hell of a lot better than pandering to the fear that politicians usually use by default.

In the end, it will be not as bad as McCain says, nor unfortunately as good as Senator Obama claims. But we ought to at least give HOPE a go.

So…sign me up and bring on the yard signs and the bumper stickers.

Political Economy: Had Enough Yet?

CQ WEEKLY
June 2, 2008

By John Cranford, CQ Columnist

It should come as no surprise that the U.S. dollar has almost never been weaker since it lost its mooring to gold back in the Nixon administration. It’s true when you look at one of the world’s youngest currencies, Europe’s euro, which rose to an all-time high against the dollar a bit over a month ago. It’s also true when you look at one of the oldest, the British pound, which hit a 27-year high against the buck in November.

The dollar has been on a long slide since February 2002, and one economic consequence of that — higher prices here — has crept into the public consciousness. Nowadays, it isn’t just American tourists beefing about the price of a vacation in France. Nor is it just a case of wounded pride that the dollar isn’t winning the World Series of exchange rates these days. People everywhere seem to understand at some level that the United States is facing a currency-driven inflation threat.

That everyone knows the dollar is weak is clear from public interest surveys. A Bloomberg News/Los Angeles Times poll two weeks ago found that 76 percent of Americans want the federal government to do something to halt the dollar’s slide. A Gallup Poll earlier in May showed a majority of those surveyed regard the dollar’s weakness as a “major problem” on top of 29 percent who regard it as a crisis.

It’s not at all clear, however, that most Americans really understand what the relative value of the dollar means for them or the U.S. economy.

First off, there’s a very close correlation between the price of oil and the dollar-euro exchange rate. They move together about 95 percent of the time, which suggests that as the dollar weakens, the price of oil rises at a commensurate pace. Yet only 4 percent of those surveyed by Gallup last month cited the dollar’s decline as the reason gasoline prices were rising.

Second, it’s evident to most economists that there is a strong correlation between the prices of imported goods and the relative value of the dollar. Import prices for all goods have been increasing this year at the fastest pace in a generation — up more than 15 percent in April over a year ago. Even when petroleum products are excluded, import prices jumped more than 6 percent in April, the biggest year-over-year gain since 1988.

What is less certain is that import prices feed directly to the retail costs paid by consumers. But even if the link is imperfect, it’s clear that the cost of everything is being pushed up at least somewhat by the weakness of the dollar (if only because the cost of transportation is higher).

So, Americans are right to a degree when they blame the falling dollar for their seemingly shrinking paychecks. But before anyone demands the head of Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr., it’s worth remembering that not too many years ago most of America’s big manufacturers were calling for the Treasury to let the dollar fall from what was by some measures a historic high point so that buyers around the world could afford their goods.

And economists were warning that market forces would knock the legs out from under the U.S. currency if we didn’t get our economic house in order. Well, guess what? Exporters got their wish and there are signs that the trade imbalance is righting itself.

On the Plus Side
The news that the economy expanded at a minimal 0.9 percent annual rate in the first three months of the year needs to be put in perspective: The United States is still buying far more overseas than it sells. But the trade deficit is narrowing, and that is counted as a boost to gross domestic product. Were it not for that improved trade picture, there would have been almost no economic growth in the first quarter, and the falling dollar gets most of the credit.

In fact, trade has been a net plus for GDP in five of the past six quarters, and the economy hasn’t gotten so much benefit from rising exports and declining imports since the early 1990s.

The change in direction on trade is likely to continue for a while, even if the dollar halts its decent. And that may be happening.

When measured against other currencies that are valued by the amount of trade each country has with the United States, the dollar was lower in April than at any point since late 1995. When that measurement is adjusted for inflation, the dollar’s relative strength two months ago was about a percentage point from its all-time low.

In May, however, the trade-weighted value of the dollar rose just a bit. Expectations that the Federal Reserve has stopped cutting interest rates — and might actually push rates higher before year’s end — seems to be encouraging some international investors to give the dollar second look. And even if the U.S. economy is in a slump, the rest of the industrialized world appears less vigorous than it did, which makes the United States look a bit better in relative terms.

So, the U.S. currency’s sustained decline appears to have been braked for the moment, though market forces — and a worsening economy — could send it lower again. At the same time, there seems little likelihood of the dollar rebounding in a big way anytime soon.

For now, then, we’ll have to bank on exports, cross our fingers on inflation and put those overseas travel plans on hold.

Wednesday, June 04, 2008

Fuzzy English

Why I won't vote for John McCain.

Official Slogan: A Leader We Can Believe In.

Proper English: A Leader in Whom We Can Believe.

Any Questions?

Priceless

Art Kit:


$130 Pesos


Keeping


yourself


occupied in the


Mexico Int. Airport


for FIVE hours:


Priceless.